Government’s Approach to Addressing AI Risks and Regulation Strategy
The UK government has outlined its approach to addressing risks associated with artificial intelligence (AI), stating that it will only legislate if existing mitigations are deemed inadequate and targeted interventions can effectively mitigate risks without stifling innovation and competition.
In a recent announcement, the government emphasized its commitment to managing AI-related risks at the forefront of development, highlighting the importance of international coordination in addressing these challenges. This follows landmark agreements reached last year, including government testing of next-generation AI models before and after deployment.
To tackle bias and discrimination in AI systems, the government is collaborating with the Equality and Human Rights Commission and the Information Commissioner’s Office to develop new solutions. Additionally, it is considering a new code of practice for cybersecurity in AI based on National Cyber Security Centre guidelines and plans to address issues such as ‘deepfakes’ through a call for evidence on AI-related risks to trust in information.
Furthermore, the government may require suppliers of AI products and services to meet minimum good practice standards to qualify for public contracts in the future. Technology law expert Sarah Cameron of Pinsent Masons noted the challenges of balancing regulation for emerging risks with avoiding a dampening effect on innovation, emphasizing the need for swift action while ensuring international collaboration on AI regulation does not delay national policymaking.
While the UK government’s approach to AI regulation is context-based, in contrast to the EU’s broad risk-based approach under the AI Act, businesses operating in the UK must also familiarize themselves with EU regulations for cross-border operations. The UK government is currently exploring existing liability frameworks and accountability in the AI context, with no immediate plans for a bespoke AI liability law as proposed in the EU.
Overall, the government’s response paper signals a potential legislative intervention specific to highly capable generative AI systems, targeting a small number of providers in the UK. As the AI landscape continues to evolve, stakeholders will need to stay informed and adapt to regulatory developments to navigate the complex legal and ethical challenges posed by AI technology.