Legal Showdown Verdict Published: PD Ports vs. South Tees Development Corporation
The judgement in the legal battle between Tees Valley Mayor Ben Houchen’s South Tees Development Corporation and Teesport operator PD Ports has been released after a six-week High Court trial overseen by Mr Justice Rajah. The dispute centered around access routes, with PD Ports defending its rights to access its land on the south bank of the River Tees, while the development corporation sought clarification on the existence of these rights.
In a 96-page document published on Monday, Mr Justice Rajah ruled in favor of PD Ports, confirming that the port operator does have historic rights across three access routes. The judgement also established a claim of trespass by PD Ports regarding a roundabout built by STDC on Smith’s Dock Road, but dismissed a claim based on proprietary estoppel.
The judgement concludes with the announcement of a further hearing to address the form of order, costs, applications for permission to appeal, and any other related matters.
The legal showdown between these Teesside titans has sparked reactions from various parties, with Middlesbrough MP Andy McDonald criticizing the decision to pursue the case and calling for a change in approach towards economic development. Labour MP Alex Cunningham also expressed disappointment in the outcome, highlighting the financial burden placed on the public due to the legal action.
PD Ports, on the other hand, welcomed the ruling, emphasizing their commitment to working with partners and stakeholders to drive investment and create jobs in the region. The port operator’s Executive Chairman, Jerry Hopkinson, expressed disappointment in the necessity of the legal action, citing the significant costs incurred by all parties involved, including taxpayers.
Overall, the judgement in this legal showdown has provided clarity on access rights and set the stage for further proceedings to address related matters. As the parties involved digest the ruling and consider their next steps, the impact of this legal battle on the Teesside community and its economic development remains a topic of discussion.
